
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green ComplexGodaddy | Green Complex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://green.cx/tag/godaddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://green.cx</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Godaddy Alternative</title>
		<link>http://green.cx/featured/godaddy-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://green.cx/featured/godaddy-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>+Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moniker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green.cx/?p=2534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/> So unless you&#8217;ve been under a rock, you&#8217;ve probabbly already heard about Godaddy supporting SOPA. I won&#8217;t reiterate what ignorance statements bob has made in regards to supporting sopa, or why companies who deal in tangible goods are backing it up. (Like who&#8217;s going to pirate make-up and pharmaceuticals electronically?) The Exodus from Godaddy: seeking an alternative This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br/><p><a href="http://green.cx/files/2011/12/Nodaddy-Stand-up-for-your-rights.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2537" title="Nodaddy Stand up for your rights" src="http://green.cx/files/2011/12/Nodaddy-Stand-up-for-your-rights.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="120" /></a> So unless you&#8217;ve been under a rock, you&#8217;ve probabbly already heard about <strong>Godaddy</strong> supporting <strong>SOPA</strong>. I won&#8217;t reiterate what ignorance statements bob has made in regards to supporting sopa, or why companies who deal in tangible goods are backing it up. (Like who&#8217;s going to pirate make-up and pharmaceuticals electronically?)</p>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2>The Exodus from Godaddy: seeking an alternative</h2>
<p>This has lead up to a<strong><em> mass exodus</em> from <em>Godaddy</em></strong> to be executed on Dec. 29th. I&#8217;ve done some research(googling) on who we should be looking at transferring<em> to</em> and it was a close call cause there&#8217;s a couple of good ones out there, but the best well rounded one I could find, with the longest history of <em>good</em> service, dependability, price, and secure (in terms of size, customer base, low domain hijacking rate, etc) Is Moniker.</p>
<p><a href="http://affiliates.moniker.com/pub/Affiliates?affiliate_id=4158&amp;landingpage=domaincheck&amp;domain="><img class="alignright" style="border-style: initial; border-color: initial;" src="http://affiliates.moniker.com/images/Moniker/registrations-125x125.gif" alt="" width="125" height="125" border="0" /></a></p>
<h2>Moniker: the quality alternative</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve provided an affiliate link (and non-affiliate link) if you want to say thanks to me for looking into them for you. It won&#8217;t cost you extra, and it doesn&#8217;t pay me very much. I&#8217;m just hope 1 or 2 people will follow through to help me with my transfer fees.  With over 1 million domains under management, Moniker is a top ten domain registrar.</p>
<h2>Another Alternative to Godaddy for the cheapskate</h2>
<p>Another top registrar to consider is namecheap. I&#8217;m extremely tempted to go with <a title='Original Link: http://www.namecheap.com?aff=25686'  href="http://green.cx/?Zl35Aihn">name cheap</a> because of their insanely low rates, and top notch recommendations from, oh about everyone. However with rates that &#8220;<strong>Cheap</strong>&#8221; and no widespread brand recognition, I worry about things like their ability to support a really tough problem, should one arise. I also don&#8217;t like my clients knowing that their business is registered with a company with &#8220;cheap&#8221; in their name. It&#8217;s only a few dollars more for moniker, and they are trusted by some very large firms. There are a <em>few (not too many)</em> reports of <a title='Original Link: http://www.namecheap.com?aff=25686'  href="http://green.cx/?Zl35Aihn">namecheap.com </a>also providing poor customer service, as in not responding to customer e-mails. As with anything milage may very. I&#8217;m sure the opposite must be true about moniker, but there&#8217;s much less &#8220;Buzz&#8221; on the internet about it. So while if you bottom line is just the best deal, and you run just a few sites, but really need to save a few bucks, than maybe <a title='Original Link: http://www.namecheap.com?aff=25686'  href="http://green.cx/?Zl35Aihn">namecheap </a>is for you. But I&#8217;m going to &#8220;play it safe&#8221; and stick with a reliable partner.</p>
<h3>TL;DR</h3>
<p>Use <strong><a href="http://affiliates.moniker.com/pub/Affiliates?affiliate_id=4158&amp;landingpage=domaincheck&amp;domain=">Moniker</a></strong> for <em>highest quality</em>/ customer satisfaction ratio (and their prices are not bad) (Non aff-<a title='Original Link: http://moniker.com'  href="http://green.cx/?uKti48Ub">link</a>)<br />
Or <strong><a title='Original Link: http://www.namecheap.com?aff=25686'  href="http://green.cx/?Zl35Aihn">NameCheap</a></strong> for <em>cheapest</em>, while still pretty good usability (Non aff <a title='Original Link: http://www.namecheap.com'  href="http://green.cx/?wx9UzoAL">link</a>)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p>A few hours of Googling</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://green.cx/featured/godaddy-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wildcard DNS on Godaddy</title>
		<link>http://green.cx/web-resources/wildcard-dns-godaddy/</link>
		<comments>http://green.cx/web-resources/wildcard-dns-godaddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>+Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green.cx/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://green.cx/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/category-images/52.original.png" width="659" height="87" alt="" title="Guides" /><img src="http://green.cx/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/category-images/40.original.png" width="659" height="87" alt="" title="Web Stuff" /><br/>Wild Card DNS is easy on Godaddy. Under “Take Total DNS Control” create a new “A NAME” Record Like this: - Domain: * - IP: 123.123.123.123 (but use the IP of the server, but you knew that) But wait! There are a couple of things to consider: You MUST use the “Deluxe” hosting plan You MUST Purchase a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://green.cx/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/category-images/52.original.png" width="659" height="87" alt="" title="Guides" /><img src="http://green.cx/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/category-images/40.original.png" width="659" height="87" alt="" title="Web Stuff" /><br/><p>Wild Card DNS is easy on Godaddy.<span id="more-748"></span></p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-752" href="http://green.cx/web-resources/wildcard-dns-godaddy/attachment/godaddy2/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-752" title="godaddy wildcard DNS" src="http://green.cx/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/godaddy2-250x279.gif" alt="" width="250" height="279" /></a>Under “Take Total DNS Control”</p>
<p>create a new “A NAME” Record</p>
<p>Like this:</p>
<p>- <strong>Domain:</strong> *<br />
- <strong>IP: </strong>123.123.123.123 (but use the IP of the server, but you knew that)</p>
<p>But wait! There are a couple of things to consider:</p>
<ol>
<li>You MUST use the “Deluxe” hosting plan</li>
<li>You MUST Purchase a “Dedicated IP Address”</li>
<li>You SHOULD use PHP5 (not 4)</li>
</ol>
<p>Failure to get a Dedicated IP Address will result in getting this Message:</p>
<blockquote>
<h1>Forbidden</h1>
<p>You don&#8217;t have permission to access / on this server.</p>
<p>Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.</p>
<hr />
<address>Apache/1.3.33 Server at AppStuff Port 80</address>
</blockquote>
<address></address>
<address>The reason is that without the dedicated IP Address, that IP would resovle to a number of domain that you don&#8217;t manage. You &#8220;Share&#8221; the ip with others, so that won&#8217;t work here. You have to have a static IP.</address>
<address></address>
<address>Why would someone want wildcard DNS? Supposed you wanted to install WordPress-Mu for example? It allows you to create blogs as sub-domains. (Like http://jason.green.cx and secret.green.cx even the root blog can be a different site)</address>
<address></address>
<address>Or you could do like Milo at <a title='Original Link: http://darkolivegreen.milov.nl/'  href="http://green.cx/?_jJYndSz">http://darkolivegreen.milov.nl/</a> (http://AnyColor. milo.nl  will show you information about any specific color, or hex value)</address>
<address></address>
<address>Some URL Shorteners use the subdomain part for the address, like http://r4d.us has it in the works to do http://url.r4d.us </address>
<address></address>
<address>Sky&#8217;s the limit, so have some fun with this DNS Trick!</address>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://green.cx/web-resources/wildcard-dns-godaddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 93/118 queries in 0.071 seconds using apc

Served from: potpiedeluxe.com @ 2012-02-09 18:25:00 -->
